Posted by richard on September 01, 2001 at 20:42:16:
In Reply to: takashi marginalia posted by richard on September 01, 2001 at 20:38:25:
: Title and date are different. I enclose them below. In response to your theories: if it where a reissue I would think it would be nearly indentical, as the carvers were so good at copying. If it were plagerized I think it also would have had a different signature or been an exact copy. I didn't think many post war prints were copied by other publishers. I can't quite make out the date as it doesn't follow a familiar enough pattern and don't read kanji for the title.
: Perhaps Takashi made a slightly different view? That also doesn't make sense.
:
: 